CLEANOUT
TIME ON CAPITAL HILL
DOUBLE
DISSDOLUTION = OPPORTUNITY
When politicians, by their
actions and inactions, spurn the aspirations of their young people
and make a vague promise that the goodies they mete out to others
will 'trickle down” to them, they are effectively slamming the door
in the face of us all.
Even in jest, the Prime
Minister of this country telling kids who want a leg up to “get a
rich parent” betrays the response of a man with about as much
compassion for his countrymen as Marie Antoinette had for her
husband's. He just doesn't get it, and what young people who want to
get a leg up are getting is something that is trickling down the leg
from above, and it is, frankly, rather disgusting.
Politicians should not be
surprised when those who are disaffected push back in irrational ways
and in unrelated areas that scream of unexpressed frustration, anger
and despair.
It is long past time we
stopped chanting about “pride in our youth” and started
respecting and engaging them directly as people to be proud of. Stop
trotting out a few of them in dayglo vests to genuflect in photo
opportunities, and pose in selfies that they'll forget wihin 24
hours. Instead, put someone invested with some clout and a required
performance target at an executive planning table and start involving
them in shopfront enterprises that empower them to DIY.
I've been part of and,
later, worked with young people for most of my working and playing
life. And lately I watch in some awe at their participation in
programmes like “Q & A” I find young people, in general, to
be faster and more agile than us in acquiring and processing
information, knowledge and wisdom, not the least I suppose because
they have grown up with cultural changes, information, tools.
techniques and technologies that we simply didn't have access to “in
our day”. I would think that a smart politician, if indeed one
exists, would really want to entrust them with driving our country to
new areas and levels of growth and development.
The United Arab Emirates
has appointed a cabinet minister of their age and empowered a special
council of youth (not “for”) youth. Courageous? Maybe even
dangerous, but not nearly as dangerous as leaving the puppets of
establishment power groups to run the show unfettered any longer.
Yet the media are still
fascinated with their Two-Party-Preferred graphs marking the
slowgress of two bloated, tired, anachronistic parties giving an
exhibition match of Hopp-Bumpo around the middle ground, playing at
skin-deep cosmetic touches while maintaining a status quo and
ignoring less conservative and less anglo-judeo-christian members of
society. Look at how recent changes to the Senate voting system were
rushed in by the “parties” to cut down on the variety of
unaligned opinion and make it easier to get their laws rubber-stamped
with a minimum of fuss. Party hacks = Good; Crossbench = Bad. The
charade is disenfranchising and marginalising agents of change,
sources of other perspectives and renewal and the possibility of
evolution. We're likely now to get even more and more of the same old
same-old. It's clearly not working. Our most strident
“representatives” are so obviously out of touch it would be funny
if it was a scene out of “Utopia” – but it isn't. This is what
passes for representative government in these “exciting times”.
How anyone could stand there and utter such inane nonsense without
bursting into laughter betrays the entrenchment of a political class
that rivals Robert Mugabe and his cronies for out-of-touchness.
It's my experience that
most of my friends and acquaintances, like me, are pedalling like
hell, uphill and against a headwind while an elite (including our
politicians) are getting an easy ride in the back seat to a swish
retirement in climes that you and I can only dream about.
Australian politicians of
the Coalition, Labor and the Greens are unabashedly creating and
leveraging separation and divisiveness to control everything for
their own ends. In a way, they can't be entirely to blame for that
because the system our anglo forefathers adopted to govern this
country was copied from a historically embedded adversarial system of
working out “what's best”. Well, it doesn't work. We're alone on
an island here – an island that's not even ours by birthright
anyway. It's “Lord of the Flies” being played for real, all so
that individual and sectional outbursts of frustration and rage can
be used to say “See? We told you those bastards would do this! You
need us to save you from “them” and their evil.” What really
pisses me off is that we now have a large enough population of morons
who believe it, and drip-fed layabouts who just don't want to be
bothered.
And if you think this all
happened by accident, you need a bloody good wake-up!
We have to cleanse the
stables of these political hacks. Fortunately the job has been made
easier – in a master-stroke of stupidity, Turnbull has made it
easier by giving everyone, including himself, the sack. It's a game
of bluff – Turnbull style.
Let's call his bluff.
Let's put out for
representatives and senators with a proven record in the wider world
outside of politics in studying, practicing and teaching tolerance
and co-operation. Then let's give these people the responsibility for
instilling tolerance into committed parents, thus creating in the
home a culture of inclusiveness. Empower them to create rewards for
successful parents and incentives for those who don't lift their
game.
Getting back to the UAE –
they have created a Minister of State for Tolerance. This person has
the job of installing and administering a formalised legal framework
that supports the tolerance that social groups already display. They
understand that the best way to influence neighbours and newcomers is
to have conscious and deliberate policies and initiatives already in
place and working.
Tolerance has got to go a
damn sight deeper than a focus-grouped slogan. Tolerant is something
to be, not to parade. If tolerance has to be talked about,
it's not there – not really. It's a way of being that each and
every single one of us has to find a way of re-creating within –
tolerance of what-is, tolerance of our various personal selves,
tolerance of our internal contradictions, and tolerance – dare I
say it – of our similarities, one to another.
Personal Tolerance cannot
be legislated for and left to somehow happen by osmosis. Tolerance is
created with deliberate intention – “I will be and practice
Tolerance in all things until it is the ground being from which I
come – so be it!”
Social Tolerance has to
arise from a groundswell of desire for personal tolerance, and must
be woven by leadership into the fabric of everyone's daily doings.
There must be an open goal to develop and support each other in
tolerance to safeguard our future and maintain the goodies we already
have. Such an approach is already proven to be effective – the old,
punitive jackboots-and-secrecy methods never did work for more than a
few years before everything fell apart. Only the dinosaurs still
believe that “one day this might work”. The take-home we have now
from the “Stop the boats” approach is that we're now up a
dead-end creek, condemned by the rest of the world and, with
international law and at-home conscience closing in, looking for a
way out that will let us save face. There is no face-saving to be
had. We have been mis-led. Time to swallow righteous pride, 'fess up
to our fuckup, change our minds, and apply ourselves to haling the
deep wounds we have inflicted on people who deserved better – much
better.
I don't see any chance now
of a bright future for any of us, singly or together, without a total
makeover – an intellectual, psycho-logical, spiritual and
emotional reconstruction that floats in a context of openness,
oneness and diversity, and an easy willingness to allow and even
welcome each other's viewpoints. That isn't going to start in any
caucus room or political party branch meeting.
It has already started in
a communal dissatisfaction and even disgust with where the political
system has now delivered us. I detect, along with disillusionment, a
discernible appetite for intellectual, emotional, cultural and
spiritual curiosity for “what do they know that I don't'” and
“isn't there a better possibility than this”?
It's true. There has got
to be something better than what we've got now.
And we've been presented
with a golden opportunity to change our ways, and make amends for the
damage we've done. With every lesson we learn comes a shift in
perspective and perception that changes our future and, eventually,
our past.
We have to start imagining
and visualising what we'd like life to be like in a post-fossil fuel,
post-mineral resources, environmentally aware and sensitive world. We
have to do it, and do it now, because our current political leaders
have disappointingly demonstrated in their so-called “plans” that
they're just not up to the task. The best pictures they offer are a
series of blue-sky graphs and pie charts.
The New World will need
more than a Power-Point presentation. It needs a vivid and coherent
story that will sweep up the less imaginative of us and join the dots
so that each of us knows what it might look like, our place in it,
and what we are expected to do from here on to play our part in
bringing it about.
Change happens by our
hands only. We don't need super-strong external powers like the
Americans, the Chinese, the Japanese or the Koreans (except for
K-Pop). What we need is the power we have from within to overcome the
ravages of past separation, division, position and opposition, and
the consequent suspicion, aversion, disgust, hatred and intolerance
that we already know only too well.
I equally firmly believe
that the kind of social change I'm talking about will lead to
significant reductions in domestic violence, petty crimes,
hooliganism, high-speed vehicle chases, car-torchings, one-punch
attacks, drug addiction and youth suicides.
Maybe I'm off in la-la
land, but a new direction can hardly do much more harm than the
trajectory of violence and crime that we're on at the moment. I see
nightly eruptions of deep unhappiness catalogued on the morning news
bulletins as symptoms of a young population that is confused,
frustrated and very pissed off at being left to fend for themselves
on the scrapheap of materialism and self-interest that doesn't care
about them one whit. Not really. Not to the extent of redressing
these failures and placing an irrevocably higher priority over
expediency.
Focusing
on happiness and co-operation, instead of divisiveness, is both
feasible and fully justified. Happiness can be measured and it can be
developed and its achievement linked to material objectives. Studies
have shown that happy people produce more, live longer, and drive
better economic development in their communities and countries. And
maybe a reduction in crimes of rage – who knows?
The
happiness of individuals, families, employers and employees, their
gratitude for their upbringing, their satisfaction with their present
lives and optimism for the future, are crucial to work which must
cut across every sector of government. Up to this point, it just
isn't happening, and the only party that may have the remotest idea
of what I'm talking about right now is the Greens, but they have a
long way to go still. Change always demands a leader's will and
persistence to make it happen. That is why there must be a minister,
fully backed by his or her leader, to guide and follow up with all
government institutions (as well as provide leadership to the private
sector).
This
is no time for hollow “if-I'm-elected” campaign promises. Under a
new regime, candidates wishing to stand for office must be required
to demonstrate a prior, effective capacity for practicing what they
espouse, consistently over a period of at least 5 years in the
private sector; if they're from the union or public sector – 10
years. I want to create a society where our people’s happiness is
paramount, by sustaining an environment in which they can take
personal responsibility for their level of contentment and truly
flourish. And we can hope, too, that our formula benefits others in
the region.
The
formula is straightforward: national development based on core
values, led by youth and focused on a future in which everyone
achieves happiness.
Simple.
But not easy. Commitment is called for to something larger than
personal ambition.
No comments:
Post a Comment