PAUSE
A MOMENT
A
PIECE OF MINDLESS WISDOM
Good
morning again. This is Pause a Moment, and I'm Barrie Barkla. This
morning I'm offering you a piece of mindless wisdom. Which poses a
problem for me, because the mind, and the tools of the mind, cannot
contain or communicate mindlessness. Mind tools, however, are
all that I have to communicate with, and mind is all that you have to
interpret my communication. So I have to find some ways around the
limitations of both our Minds. The way I'm going to do this is dance
around the message, which has no words, and ask you not to attach
yourself to anything I say, but to look inside yourself and feel
where I'm pointing to in you with what I say. If you're up for
that challenge, so am I. Here we go.....
[Ebony
and Ivory – Stevie Wonder]
As
part of the
experience of being human I have noticed that we have an inner drive
to hold all our attitudes and beliefs in harmony and avoid disharmony
(or dissonance). I've also noticed (mainly because I've been smacked
over the ears by it so many times) that life is peppered with
inconsequential nonsense, happenstance, illogicality, inconsistency
and balderdash. There's an abyss between the extremes of logic and
order on one side // and purely random coincidence on the other.
Psychologists have a term for this abyss of disquiet = they call it
Cognitive Dissonance.
[La
Raya – Eric Serra]
Without
a purpose, life has no meaning......
Life
has no purpose, therefore life is meaningless.......
Life
itself is the Purpose.
“Cognitive
dissonance” also refers
to a situation involving conflicting
attitudes,
beliefs or behaviors. It
sheds first rays of light on otherwise puzzling, irrational, and even destructive
behaviour.
For example, when people smoke (behaviour) and they also know that
smoking alarmingly multiplies their chances of cancer (cognition), they are bathing in cognitive dissonance. I
have a neighbour who smokes – but only outside. She won't smoke in
her own nest, and before she lights up she puts on gloves. So
there's something she doesn't want to get on her furniture or on her
fingers, but she doesn't hesitate to coat the inside of her
bronchioles and lungs with it. The dissonance between her behaviour
and her rationalising produces chronic feelings
of dis-comfort, leading to feelings of frustration,
hunger, dread, guilt, anger, embarrassment, resentment anxiety and
depression.
So, to feel better, she lights up another fag!
If Dissonance reaches calamitous proportions, it
can
lead you to alter one or more of your attitudes, beliefs or behaviours to reduce the agony and restore balance etc. But in most
cases, discord leads instead to an elaborate and phoney justification
and cover-up,
that itself has to be continually plastered over, re-painted,
camouflaged and otherwise hidden, until the whole thing eventually
busts out in the form of physical, mental and spiritual dis-ease. One
example of such a cover-up is illustrated in Aesop's fable about “The
Fox and the Grapes” – a
fox sees some high-hanging grapes and wishes to eat them. When the
fox is unable to think of a way to reach them, he decides that the
grapes are probably not worth eating anyway, with the justification
the grapes probably are not ripe or that they are sour (hence the
common phrase "sour
grapes").
[I
don't Want to Talk About It – Everything But the Girl]
There's
a pattern here: one desires something, finds it unattainable, and
reduces one's dissonance by criticising it.
By
sniping, rationalising
and/or making excuses, we temporarily reduce
our anxiety about conflicting cognitions but – it's important to
note – the conflict is still there, just driven underground – a
far more dangerous place for it to be.
Compulsive
Controllers – the ones who insist on picking what they like,
manipulating it to their own satisfaction, and grinding anything
perverse into obedience -- are particularly prone to eventually
tumble into the abyss of dissonance. The only question for CC's is
“How low will they go to come out on top?” Controllers are too
stupid to realise that control is not even possible; the human
condition is lavishly laced with Paradox, Inconsistency and
Contradiction, and that isn't going to change any time soon.
[Ee,
Oh, Ooh – The Goons]
I
learned from The Goons early in my life that there was a great deal
of fun and satisfaction to be had in surfing across the gulf between
sanity and insanity with a pack of Eccles, Bluebottles, Moriarties,
Minnie Bannisters and Major Bloodnocks, crashing sound effects and
cries of “He's fallen in the water!”
Spike
Milligan, Douglas Adams and Terry Pratchett would have been required
reading in my household, but the kids and grandkids got there first.
Mind you, I did put them on the bookshelf within easy reach, and
simply watched what the kids went for. My youngest grandson (now 7) is
a Whovian, and already understands the concept of selling your
soul.... and has made up his own mind already on the dynamics of
standing-for..... and falling-for....
The
logical and reasonable approaches to living are the province of your
Mind and Reasonable Logic. The illogical aspects are the province of your Heart,
Intuition and Emotional Logic. When People find themselves caught in an
absurd situation, their logical minds jump in to ease the tension and
cover up the chasm by inventing a CRI = a Comfortable, Reasonable
Illusion. And if you're at all slow off the mark, there is no
shortage of saviours who'll offer you a Comfortable, Reasonable
Illusion – for an undisclosed price.
Our
world abounds in inconsistent possibilities, some of which we may share, and some of which we may differ upon. For example, I like ice cream, and I
love my children. Those two things, you would think, are hardly
likely to come into conflict, especially when I take my grandchildren for a walk
anywhere near an ice cream shop. Well, not until I had a few heart
attacks. Then my love for ice cream and the threat of never seeing my
grandchildren grow up brought "ice cream" and "children" into sharp conflict.That's a dissonance for me; it probably is not one for you.
When
two or more beliefs, opinions, behaviours or experiences come into
conflict with each other, Mind insists that Consistency can only be
achieved by espousing one possibility, and dismissing all else
– the Either/Or Imperative.
Another typical example is one where a person who
holds some sway over your opinions maligns one of your friends.
While your experience of your friend may not agree with the defamer,
if you want something badly enough from the defamer, you will mask
your personal experience of your friend and give at least tacit
agreement to the more powerful group perception: you will sell out
and go along to get along. Remember when Jesus the Christ said to
Peter “Before the rooster crows tomorrow morning, you will have
sold out on me three times.” And he was right. And we still carry
on that tradition. But then you have to explain to yourself
why you have sold out on the only genuine thing you have -- your
experience. The resulting cover-up to maintain cognitive consistency
will covertly erode your self esteem, and can give rise to later
irrational and sometimes maladaptive behaviour.
We
hold a welter of ideas, opinions, concepts and beliefs about the
world and ourselves, every one of which we hold to be True and Right.
But when they clash – and they do -- a discrepancy is evoked,
resulting in a state of chronic tension. And I stress that you are
doing this to yourself, and I do it to myself. I'm reminded of the
same man who was crucified the next morning by a bunch of powerful
postulators who'd persuaded the local military governor, against his instincts, with
awesomely reasonable arguments to put the pest to death. Does the
phrase “Forgive them, Father, they haven't a clue what they're
doing!” ring any bells??
Now,
the seemingly obvious solution seems to me to be that, when values
come into conflict, both This AND That are valid. I go out of my way
to embrace opposites. But that's about as popular with most people as
a pork chop in a synagogue. Too bad. I love harmony, and I get that
the experience of dissonance and tension is unpleasant. I do get
that. But sometimes that's where the path through the wilderness
lies. And the end result of that open an embrace is Harmony that resonates.
Fortunately
the heart and intuition don't have a problem with dissonance – no worries! But we rarely go to the heart for advice because the Mind,
having created the warring elements of the dissonance jumps in to
defend its arguments and maintain its top-dog status. We are compelled by
mind to reduce or eliminate dissonance, and achieve consonance (i.e.
Agreement) by fair means or devious. In the absence of heartful Accord we are driven to secure a poor substitute --
Agreement -- from our so-called friends and supporters, to cover up for
the uncomfortable fact that, internally, we are literally in two
minds. And so are our friends, but they're lying about it, too. And
there are times when we expediently jump from our usual position to a
position opposite, much to the bewilderment and resentment of those
around us. “What
the hell's going on?” we
cry, but do nothing to find out. Do you?
Resonance arises from, and further broadcasts harmony and clarity: dissonance creates dis-ease, pretence,
deceit and concealed cross-purposes. When
the dissonance shows up between two individuals or groups, they start
playing the Right/Wrong Game with each other.
I'm
right, therefore you're wrong
You're
wrong, so I must be right -- [The most common version]
Everyone agrees that I'm right, so you're wrong -- [The political and advertising version]
You
can't prove I'm wrong, so I'm right. -- [The Superior Intelligence version]
When
the dissonance shows up within you or me, we invent an elaborate
Illusion – a front of Pretence and Deceit, and deflect attention
elsewhere, hoping no-one will notice our dishonesty.
Cognitive
dissonance was first investigated by Leon Festinger, arising out of a
study of a cult which believed that the earth was going to be
destroyed by a flood, and what happened to its members —
particularly the really committed ones who had given up their homes
and jobs to work for the cult — when the flood did not happen.
While a minority of fringe members managed to recognise that they had
made fools of themselves and to "put it down to experience",
the bulk of members went along with the leadership and re-interpreted
the evidence to show that they were right all along, and the earth
was not destroyed because of the diligence and sacrifice of the
leaders, and the faithfulness of the cult members.
When
someone is forced to do (publicly) something they (privately) really
don't want to do, dissonance is created between their cognition (I have reservations about doing this) and their behaviour (I'm doing it).
Forced compliance occurs when an individual is persuaded to perform
an action that is inconsistent with his or her core beliefs. Under
the label of Forced Compliance I also include situations where you or
I allow an authority figure to get away with bad behaviour against
someone else. You don't stand up for your friend because you could
invite some tyranny down upon yourself. And since the behaviour can't
be changed -- it is already in the past, dissonance will need to be
reduced by re-evaluating or re-contextualising your attitude
to what has been done. Now we're starting to get a handle on how
tyrants can get away with genocide while so-called good people keep
silent and go about their daily business, apparently unfazed. Anyone
who does not get that, given the right circumstances, they have sold
out, and will again sell out on their principles is doomed to be the
victim of their dis-owned hypocrisy. And they'll use the same
strategies for concealing and denying the pain of their dissonance.
This
prediction has been tested experimentally: in an intriguing
experiment, Festinger
and Carlsmith (1959) asked
participants to perform a series of dull tasks (such as turning pegs
in a peg board for an hour). As you can imagine, participants'
attitudes toward this task were highly negative. Bored! Then they
were paid either $1 or $20 to tell a waiting participant that the
tasks were really interesting. Almost all of the participants agreed
to walk into the waiting room and persuade the next subject
accomplice that the boring experiment would be fun.
[The
Emperor's New Clothes – Danny Kaye]
It
is so easy to get most people to sell out – to go along with you and the
crowd in order to get along. Just make sure that you have something that they desperately want. It's doubly scary, because neither you
nor I are any different. My only difference is that I will tell you
in advance under what circumstances I'm likely to sell out on you. I know
where they are, and I'm OK with them where they are. But my honesty
has an utterly selfish motive. By 'fessing up in advance to my
sell-out points, I've found I don't do it. Here's a paradox for you –
by acknowledging our contradictions and sell-out points, we get free
of them. Conversely, you cannot change what you don't acknowledge.
Cognitive
dissonance can occur in many areas of your life, but it is
particularly evident in situations where your behaviour conflicts
with beliefs that are integral to your self-identity. For example,
consider a situation in which a man whose public image is of being a
good organiser, a visionary, and fiscally responsible. He is
regularly being constrained by his accountant when he suggests
procedure changes that are not good practice, and his handling of
orders, invoicing, receipting and reporting leaves headaches for the
bookkeepers. He's very cavalier about procedures.
The
conflict:
It
is important to the man to maintain his self-image as an imaginative
and responsible manager.
He
also demands to be able to run things his way. He sees the accounts
department, and most people below him, as obstructive.
In
order to reduce this dissonance between Image and Ambition, he has a
few different choices. He can go to business classes and find out
how he should be doing it, or he can involve more people to help him
run his projects, or he can lower “good manager” in his hierarchy
of values. Or he can go to work on the reputation of his zealous
accountant, amass evidence of obstruction, and eventually get the man
fired.
[Yoga
Sounds – Deep Sleep]
Some
other common examples of discrepancy between our cognitions and our
actions are – the adjustments we have to make when two people we
feel equally close to get divorced from each other. We find ourself juggling a
core belief
that lying is bad (First cognition) with feeling forced to lie,
perhaps in the “kindness” guise of sparing someone's feelings
(second cognition).
Another very common example of cognitive dishonesty occurs in the
purchasing decisions we make on a weekly basis, such as opposing
the slaughter of animals and eating meat.
Or whether we buy local, or the cheaper generic options, or specials,
regardless of where they're sourced? Then watch the hoops our minds
jump through to justify those conflicting choices and decisions!
Meanwhile, we're doing irreparable internal damage to our integrity
and self-esteem and we don't realise it. We think if no-one else
notices, it doesn't matter. It does. It matters – inexorably.
Cognitive
dissonance has also been demonstrated to occur when people seek to:
- Explain
inexplicable feelings:
We're being actively encouraged to be alert and alarmed about “boat
people”. Suddenly an avalanche of irrationally fearful rumours
about Muslims, criminal people smugglers and general undesirables
spews out of my Inbox, even though I'm not involved, because of the
need of those who send me this stuff to justify their
unexamined anxieties and get agreement from anyone who'll listen.
Truth is, it's possible their anxieties have very little to do with
the boat people, either. We're all very good at projecting our fears
away from where they belong and onto convenient, socially acceptable
scapegoats. Jews? Bikies? Aboriginals? Collingwood supporters?
People
minimise regret about irrevocable choices:
Bettors at a racetrack are more confident in their chosen horse just
after placing the bet because now they cannot change it. Washing
ones hands (figuratively) is a very popular method of dealing with a
situation where you've made a decision that flies in the face of
your own more basic life choices. I've done it recently. And you
think that publicly washing your hands of the matter absolves you?
You hope that's an end to it? I have bad news for you.... you are
already reaping what you have sown – you just haven't noticed yet.
I'm not absolved from what I walked away from, but I don't regret it
either. I will willingly live with the consequences of it, whatever
they might be.
People
align their perceptions of a person with their behaviour toward that
person:
There's someone in my life at the moment who periodically makes
overtures to befriend me, while alternately doing her best to remove
me from an organisation that she controls. I find her duality
awesome, to say the least, but not nearly as awesome as her ability
to not see it herself, and to cajole others not to see it either.
People
reaffirm and reinforce already held beliefs:
We all tend to read or access information that affirms our already
established opinions, and we are reluctant to reference material
that contradicts them.
This
bias is particularly apparent when a person has 'high commitment' to
their attitudes.
There
are other ways that cognitive dissonance is involved in shaping our
views about people, as well as our own identities. Self-Evaluation
Maintenance theory
suggests
that people feel dissonance when their cherished position, skills or
traits are outmatched by someone new arriving on the scene. Jill
(let's call her) feels threatened. In a state of Cognitive
Dissonance, Jill (Underdog) can pretend to care less about what she
does, or (Topdog) she can resolve her sense of inferiority by
isolating, negating or covertly attacking the newcomer until he/she
goes away. Boy, have I been on the receiving end of that one through
my life.... maybe that says something about me?
Why
are Cognitive Dissonance, Paradox and Contradiction so important?
Well,
firstly because they are an inescapable fact of life. Burying your
head in the sand is the surest way to invite whatever you're trying
to ignore to come and bite you on the bum. And Ignorance is no
defence on Judgement Day either, because your judge has all your
secret files, and won't believe you like everyone else did.
Paradox
and Contradiction are the greatest aids to Humility and Wisdom, and
the surest antidotes that I know of to the ignorance of
Absolutism, Fundamentalism, Certainty and Belief. These gremlins are
not evidence of wisdom or faith; they are symptoms of a lack
of either wisdom or faith.
Recognising
Cognitive Dissonance is important because it plays a spoiler role in
many value judgements and decisions. When we become more aware of how
conflicting beliefs impact our decision-making processes, and those
of groups we belong to, you'll find you have acquired a greatly
improved ability to make faster and more accurately aware choices,
independently of your prior conditioning.
Here's
a Monster Alert. If you have unacknowledged dissonance in any part of
your life,// controllers, manipulators and marketers will pick you up
on their radar. They will see you coming with lights flashing and
bells ringing. They will quickly find your weak spots and offer you
a seemingly tailor-made CRI – Comfortable, Reasonable Illusion in
return for your compliance – passive and active. Cult-leaders,
charismatics, bullies, politicians and shonky door-to-door
salespeople are on the lookout for you, and it's open season. You
have been warned. If you want protection, think for yourself.
Get
comfortable with Contradiction and Paradox; they are harbingers of
Wisdom. “Many hands make light work” is equally as valid as “Too
many cooks spoil the broth”, or “If you want something done
properly, do it yourself.” They're all true, and your head isn't
going to make that OK. Your head says “U-uh! One or the
other. Make up your mind.” How can you make up your mind when you have at least two of them, and only one microphone between
them???
Would
you like to know what your other mind is doing while it doesn't have
the microphone? Take some notice of your dreams.
Paradox
is a reminder that there's more to life than minding. Paradox is
an open question -- an invitation to see something anew. Think of
Contradictions and Paradoxes for a moment as optical illusions
inviting us to see in a new way. Paradoxes chafe against our
prejudices, concepts, ideas and opinions, inviting us to loosen up,
take off our blinkers, blink twice and take another look. Paradoxes
point to the limitations of our presumptions about what's real. Think
of contradictions as life's messengers telling us we're peeping
through a keyhole and missing the whole 360º panorama. They invite
us to loosen up on what we think is so, and venture once more into a
wider unknown.
How
to Reduce Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger
noted three ways we try to reduce or minimise cognitive dissonance
for ourselves:
lowering
the importance
of one of the discordant factors,
tipping
the balance by adding consonant
elements,
or
changing
one of the dissonant factors.
I have a fourth
suggestion to throw into the pot. In the past you have tried either
to reason the opposites out of shape so that they'll fit into some
existing pigeon-hole, or to deny completely the inconvenient
existence of the other side of the coin. (If I ignore it, it'll go
away) In my experience, neither solution works. The questions
remain. Instead, free your mind by going to the Heart and allowing it
to give a quiet “yes” to one aspect “and” its diametric
opposite. Both are true. Your mind will go nuts: let it. When you
lose your mind, you may come to your senses.
When
both opposites are allowed their truth, some deeper truth lies close
by.
To
conclude, I offer you a Sufi Paradox: you cannot apprehend the
mysteries of Paradox through work – AND – you cannot apprehend
the mysteries of Paradox without work....
Stand
in that one for a while and see what shows up....
[Both
Sides Now – Sarah Macliver]
[The
Road To Kingdom Come – The Idea of North]